<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Examples of the Wisdom of Crowds in Daily Life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://powazek.com/posts/1933/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://powazek.com/posts/1933</link>
	<description>It&#039;s pronounced poe-WAH-zek.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EcoWater AZ</title>
		<link>http://powazek.com/posts/1933/comment-page-1#comment-5096</link>
		<dc:creator>EcoWater AZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 23:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powazek.com/?p=1933#comment-5096</guid>
		<description>I had no idea about the Ipod...I will have to check my skip count.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had no idea about the Ipod&#8230;I will have to check my skip count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Powazek</title>
		<link>http://powazek.com/posts/1933/comment-page-1#comment-5083</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Powazek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 04:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powazek.com/?p=1933#comment-5083</guid>
		<description>Tom: Digg is *just* a leaderboard. And Flickr&#039;s leaderboard is calculated daily. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/explore/interesting/2009/05/16/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&#039;s yesterday&#039;s&lt;/a&gt;.

Note that I&#039;m not saying this is a good thing - in fact I know it&#039;s not. But they&#039;re there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom: Digg is *just* a leaderboard. And Flickr&#8217;s leaderboard is calculated daily. <a href="http://www.flickr.com/explore/interesting/2009/05/16/" rel="nofollow">Here&#8217;s yesterday&#8217;s</a>.</p>
<p>Note that I&#8217;m not saying this is a good thing &#8211; in fact I know it&#8217;s not. But they&#8217;re there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Carden</title>
		<link>http://powazek.com/posts/1933/comment-page-1#comment-5082</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Carden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 02:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powazek.com/?p=1933#comment-5082</guid>
		<description>How do you tell the difference between Wisdom of Crowds and other, similar network effects like first-mover advantage, preferential attachment, winner-takes-all, etc?

Especially with the Limewire example I think this is worth bearing in mind - isn&#039;t that why sites like Flickr and Digg expressly *don&#039;t* have a leader board?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you tell the difference between Wisdom of Crowds and other, similar network effects like first-mover advantage, preferential attachment, winner-takes-all, etc?</p>
<p>Especially with the Limewire example I think this is worth bearing in mind &#8211; isn&#8217;t that why sites like Flickr and Digg expressly *don&#8217;t* have a leader board?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: myla</title>
		<link>http://powazek.com/posts/1933/comment-page-1#comment-5080</link>
		<dc:creator>myla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 01:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powazek.com/?p=1933#comment-5080</guid>
		<description>Brilliant article. And you&#039;re right: Amazon.com rarely gets my recommendations right b/c I often use it to buy presents for other people. So while I might not like what it is they&#039;re recommending (supposedly for me), the recommendations that are totally off base (case in point: Hannah Montana isn&#039;t my thing, though my niece loves her) I&#039;m sure you&#039;re right, the folks I shop for probably would. Probably would help everyone if your gifting purchases could be classified so you could, let&#039;s say, get &quot;Recommendations for you, Myla Kent&quot; and &quot;Recommendations for your niece, Ashley&quot;. 

That would be far more useful for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant article. And you&#8217;re right: Amazon.com rarely gets my recommendations right b/c I often use it to buy presents for other people. So while I might not like what it is they&#8217;re recommending (supposedly for me), the recommendations that are totally off base (case in point: Hannah Montana isn&#8217;t my thing, though my niece loves her) I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re right, the folks I shop for probably would. Probably would help everyone if your gifting purchases could be classified so you could, let&#8217;s say, get &#8220;Recommendations for you, Myla Kent&#8221; and &#8220;Recommendations for your niece, Ashley&#8221;. </p>
<p>That would be far more useful for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

