<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2009-11-03</title>
	<atom:link href="http://powazek.com/posts/2189/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://powazek.com/posts/2189</link>
	<description>It&#039;s pronounced poe-WAH-zek.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stéphane Deschamps</title>
		<link>http://powazek.com/posts/2189/comment-page-1#comment-5919</link>
		<dc:creator>Stéphane Deschamps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powazek.com/posts/2189#comment-5919</guid>
		<description>Oh yes it does happen in comments, all the time. Especially when threads are long and comments themselves are longer than a few lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes it does happen in comments, all the time. Especially when threads are long and comments themselves are longer than a few lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://powazek.com/posts/2189/comment-page-1#comment-5918</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powazek.com/posts/2189#comment-5918</guid>
		<description>So, do you think it happens in comments too?

Comments have a thread (context) although I wonder how many people read the thread before commenting? Maybe the same applies to some email exchanges: devoid of context they get misinterpreted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, do you think it happens in comments too?</p>
<p>Comments have a thread (context) although I wonder how many people read the thread before commenting? Maybe the same applies to some email exchanges: devoid of context they get misinterpreted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

