This is Derek Powazek Fray Magazineer
This is Powazek
Tonight's SunsetSleepyGrowthBaby Mask PlantGrowthGrowthGrowth
<begging> Prove your love. Subscribe to Fray! </begging>

Happiness Math: Yesands vs Nobuts

It took me 34 years to learn it, but I’ve finally figured out a basic mathematical principle that predicts my happiness in life. Here it is:

Take the number of times you hear “yes, and” in a day. Then take the number of times you hear “no, but” in the day. Now subtract the nobuts from the yesands. If your result is in the positive, so are you. If your results are in the negative, befriend other people.


Nikolai by Heather Champ.

This is not about avoiding disagreement - I love good debate. It’s about communication style and what makes people around you happy. It’s also not about extremes: I’m not saying to avoid nobut people entirely - just make sure they don’t overwhelm the yesands.

A nobut person is not listening to you. They’re just playing tennis, sending any ovation you make back at you. A nobut person will almost always make you unhappy, because they have to be right all the time, which means you have to be wrong.

A yesand person is listening. They care enough about you and the conversation you’re having to be additive in their conversation. You can both be right together, which feels good for everyone. People who feel good are more likely to find agreements, move forward, and be creative. Defensive, embattled people rarely make anything great.

And here’s the really sneaky bit. You can use either technique to communicate almost any idea. Consider:

You: I love burritos.

Nobut Person: No, but hamburgers are so much better.
Yesand Person: Yes, and I love hamburgers, too!

You: I think this is so well designed.

Nobut Person: No, but the typography sucks and the colors are awful.
Yesand Person: Yes, and I see so many ways it can get even better.

It may seem like this is being dishonest with your opinions, but it’s not. It’s communicating them in a way that’s productive. It’s about surrounding yourself with people who allow you to be successful together, instead of making every conversation a mini “king of the hill” battle.

Ask yourself, who would you rather hang with?

10 Comments

What about “Yesbuts” and “Noands”?

Jeremy on 6 January 2008 @ 1am

Yes, but be careful you don’t end up sounding like a complete and total prat who always uses “yes, and” even when they completely disagree. I’ve heard that “be positivie no matter what” technique used by some managers during design discussions and it comes over as false and condescending.

Mix it up a bit, favouring the positive side.

BTW, watch an episode of Little Britain with Vicky Pollard who does an hilarious “Yeah, but no, but yeah, but no, but yeah” line.

Paul M. Watson on 6 January 2008 @ 2am

Yes, but you are ignoring the hardest case - Yesbuts.

They supposedly agree with you but actually don’t.

Yesbuts muddle the conversation and spins it in a way that leaves no way to go ahead with anything.

Hanan Cohen on 6 January 2008 @ 3am

This is a cardinal rule in improv theater. Don’t deny your group and start to work towards better “group mind”.

Stefanie Noble on 6 January 2008 @ 7am

Yes, Derek, the nobuts have little to offer conversation and the ecosystem of ideas. Good point. And you also might consider that measuring happiness with the ratio of yesands to nobuts might resemble something closer to co-depenedency than fulfillment. I wonder if its just yet another way to classify good and evil and if only we surrounded ourselves with more “good” people, the world would be a better place.

Banky the hack on 6 January 2008 @ 7am

i used to be such a nice guy, make everybody like themselves, and so of course they liked me. then one day, i don’t know what happened, but something switched. i started seeing people’s shit, and told them about it. now those people hate me, and leave me alone, and i have to say it is quite preferable…

enjoy, gregory

gregory on 6 January 2008 @ 8am

To Stefanie’s point: http://yesand.com/

Mike on 6 January 2008 @ 4pm

I say “yes, but” way too much, and it usually means I agree but there’s more that neither of us have even mentioned yet… kind of an invitation to go wild and brainstorm. I suppose I should use “yes, and”…

Anytime we use either phrase at our house it immediately dissolves into the above-mentioned Vicky Pollard yeah-but-no-but-yeah hilarity. Every single time.

Julie on 6 January 2008 @ 4pm

Oh my God, speaking of Vicky Pollard — must-have: http://www.bbcshop.com/invt/01725

Julie on 6 January 2008 @ 4pm

This reminds me a bit of the good ol’ yesbutters vs. whynotters.

Antonio Cavedoni on 13 January 2008 @ 4pm

Comments for this post are now closed.