How to Take Halfway Decent Photos with an iPhone

Heather and I think of our cellphones more as cameras with phone attachments than phones with camera functions. So when a new one comes along, the first question we ask is, “How’s the camera?”

Today I took my new iPhone to the local dog park to find out. Short answer: About average for a cellphone, with some unique issues around color shifts and motion blur. But I’m happy with its 1600×1200px output, and am enjoying finding out what it’s good for, and what it’s not.

For the long answer, and a few tips and tricks, read on.


Hold Very StillPork store

Like most cellphone cameras, the iPhone camera is physically tiny, and that means there’s a limit to how much light it can take in. So the number one piece of advice for good, clear photos is, as always: Hold still. Your best photos will be when you’re not moving and neither is your subject.


Virtual Shutter ButtonFirst mirror self-portrait with iphone

Complicating matters is that the shutter button is part of the touch-sensitive screen. That means you can’t find it by feel. So for my fellow self-portraiteers, holding the camera at arm’s length and shooting yourself is quite a challenge. The dedicated shutter button is the one thing I miss from my Sidekick.

Also like most cellphone cameras, there’s a long shutter lag, so shooting anything in motion is not easy. After some experimentation, I’ve found that the shutter does not fire when your finger goes down on the shutter button – it fires when your finger comes off. So one successful technique is to put your finger down on the button, line up the shot, then release to shoot. It helps lessen the lagtime.


Crazy Color CastHate 07

If you want to test the color shift of a camera, take a photo of a medium value, solid color wall. The camera will automatically try to find the contrast points, and can blow out the image in really interesting ways.

So far, I’ve found that the iPhone camera has a real problem here. The white values go very blue. I’ve also noticed that the center of the image goes red, while the outside goes blue. Check out the circular color shifts in the photo above. The wall, in reality, was all a light tan. The red and blue casts you see are all from the image interpolation in the camera. The crazy graffiti is from Haight Street.


Strange Motion “Blur”iPhone "Blur"

One more reason to hold still. This photo was taken while I was panning, tracking the subject with the camera. There was plenty of light, so the camera did not blur the image, it just kind of twisted it. Very strange effect.


The iPhone ProblemWave to the iPhone

But the biggest problem with using the iPhone camera, at least for now, is the fact that it’s an iPhone. Take it out in a public place for a quick shot, and you’ll soon be surrounded by your fellow gadget freaks doing a tour and answering questions. I’m thinking of having a FAQ printed up: No, it doesn’t record video. Yup, only AT&T. The Edge network is pretty good, actually. Yes, it was kind of expensive. Etc.


In general, I’m very happy with the iPhone and its camera. It’s a cellphone camera, so my expectations were low. And like all cameras, it’ll be good at some things and bad at others.

If you look at all the photos I took today, you’ll notice a distinct blue hue to them and that they’re generally pretty dark, even though they were shot in bright sun. (I notice the same thing in Scoble’s shots.) I’m sure the camera and its software will get better over time, but for a 1.0, it ain’t half bad.


Fray

14 Comments

Or get a Nokia N95. Heheh.

We did a comparison today: http://scobleizer.com/2007/07/01/going-on-an-iphoto-walk/

Posted by Robert Scoble on 1 July 2007 @ 9pm

Great post, Derek! I’ve been playing with the camera for a few days and, you’re right, it does give some interesting motion blurs.

Posted by Lincoln on 1 July 2007 @ 10pm

That motion blur is pretty wild. Reminds me very much of something I saw on Flickr a couple of months ago where someone was asking how to reproduce an effect shown in a photograph from the 1920s of a race car where the slow speed of the shutter curtain had caused a distortion of the wheels in a way that neatly emphasized the speed. IIRC, the photographer was an amateur French teenager who left photography shortly thereafter only to pick it up again after WWII when he was living in the U.S., at which point he revisited his old negatives and found this shot, which would be difficult to create with more modern technology. Wish I could remember the name of the photographer; it’s apparently a fairly famous photograph. I just spent fifteen minutes on Flickr looking for it but couldn’t find it.

Anyway, it looks like an effect that could be used effectively for certain subjects is kind of the point I was trying to make….

Posted by ralph on 2 July 2007 @ 1pm

re: the “blur”, looks like a rolling shutter effect. Pixel rows would get read out over time, and by the time the readout gets to the other side of the sensor the subject has moved.

Not sure why you are seeing it though!

Posted by Andy on 2 July 2007 @ 4pm

Re: the color cast – have you heard/seen this issue on other iPhone photos? After doing a quick search on Flickr, the outdoor shots I saw didn’t seem to have that strong blue cast.

Posted by Jen on 3 July 2007 @ 4pm

Thanks for this! My first question about the iPhone was re: the camera quality. I’m happy with my Sidekick3 and I know I won’t be getting a new phone anytime soon, but I’m still curious [and after seeing the two screens compared, a little jealous].

I’ve noticed with my phone the color cast issue works itself out if you give the camera an extra moment or two to adjust to the light. Is that true with this one as well?

Posted by kristyk on 3 July 2007 @ 5pm

On my Samsung D807, the camera would do the same thing if there was a bump or any tracking of a subject. Kind of fun to play with, but maddening when trying to capture a moment.

This is a great and useful post. I kind of like the yellow/green cast the iPhone has, but that’s because I’m going through a phase.

Posted by blurb on 4 July 2007 @ 3pm

My iPhone also has the odd color shift from center to edge. After some of the craziness dies down at the Apple Store, I plan to take mine in to see if it’s a defect that can be fixed.

I know cam-phone aren’t pro-quality devices but this is really bad.

Posted by jay on 8 July 2007 @ 5am

I’m not thrilled at the iPhone’s ability to white balance either. I think that if you’re shooting something in the shade, and if there’s any bright sunlight at all in the picture, the phone will get fooled into balancing for the bright sunlight.
I do wish the metering was more heavily center-weighted.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/geraldoh/

Posted by Gerald on 12 July 2007 @ 8am

i think that “strange” motion blur is as a result of the lens being comprised of water not glass. i noticed it from day one. you can easily see it by viewing the camera’s image, before actually taking a shot, and quickly moving the phone. with a twist of your wrist you should see this weird distortion. i immediately thought it looked like an effect created by water distorting light. i don’t know how to confirm this but a Google search will at least prove that such a thing exists. it has obvious beneficial ramifications when used for mobile devices. still not a desirable “feature” in any case.

Posted by nebtron on 24 July 2007 @ 12pm

re: strange motion blur

My Treo 650 does this as well, though not consistently, which is baffling.

Posted by Joshua Blankenship on 24 July 2007 @ 12pm

The ’strange motion blur’ is in fact a rolling shutter artifact and indicates the iPhone has a CMOS instead of a CCD sensor. CMOS sensors are read line by line (unlike CCDs which read out all lines at once), so the delay between reading the first line and the last line introduces the ‘wobbly’ effect when the camera is moved. Sony’s CMOS-based HDV cameras exhibit this same effect but to a lesser degree – the faster the image processing chip the less delay between the first and last lines.

On the iPhone the effect is far more noticeable in very low light – Apple seems to have made the choice to go with a slower ’shutter speed’ rather than boosting the gain very much, which essentially means light is being sampled at each point on the chip for a longer period of time. This increases the distortion because it increases the delay between the first sample and the last – but it also produces images that are less noisy than if they’d gone with the higher gain.

If they ever enable video recording on the iPhone my guess is they’ll have to go the other route (high gain instead of slow shutter speed) because the distortion in very low light is some of the worst I’ve ever seen from a CMOS.

Posted by Evan Donn on 24 July 2007 @ 3pm

For the price of the N95 you are better with an iPhone and a separate camera. Personally I like phones to have crappy cameras that make everything look like a still frame of amateur porno.

Posted by Fred Hamranhansenhansen on 24 July 2007 @ 4pm

Haven’t some of the rumors about the first fixes they will apply to the iPhone via software updates, will be the iphone cameras shutter, or perhaps some image stabilization?

I say, make those weird slit shutter smears while you still can, and use them as iPhone wallpaper.

Posted by Hans Flagon on 27 July 2007 @ 4pm